<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Evan Bartlett 's blog &#187; web apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evbart.com/category/web-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evbart.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:52:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tumblr and Posterous side by side</title>
		<link>http://evbart.com/2008/09/tumblr-and-posterous-side-by-side/</link>
		<comments>http://evbart.com/2008/09/tumblr-and-posterous-side-by-side/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evbart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinlists.com/?p=171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I saw posterous pitch at the Y combinator demo day, I signed up for an account right away and started doing a lot more mobile blogging. Then after a few days, I thought to myself &#8220;isn&#8217;t this a lot like that tumblr thing all my tech friends are using?&#8221; So I talked to them [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I saw <a href="http://posterous.com/">posterous</a> pitch at the Y combinator demo day, I signed up for an account right away and started doing a lot more mobile blogging.</p>
<p>Then after a few days, I thought to myself &#8220;isn&#8217;t this a lot like that <a href="http://www.tumblr.com/">tumblr</a> thing all my tech friends are using?&#8221;</p>
<p>So I talked to them about the differences, and the general response was that Tumblr was more social, so I setup an account on Tumblr as well.</p>
<p>Then because I was too lazy to thouroughly test out both platforms, I just decided I&#8217;d send my blog post via email to both services, so I could get comfortable actively using both platform and seeing the results.  The posterous account seemed like a great place to point my non-nerdy non-techy friends, and tumblr would be a place where I could keep up on the tech discussions, since thats where the tech audience already set up camp.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Here they are running <a href="http://evangetserious.com/">side</a> (posterous) by <a href="http://evbart.tumblr.com/">side</a> (tumblr)</p>
<p>Posterous:</p>
<p><a href="http://lifeinlists.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/picture-8.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-175" title="picture-8" src="http://lifeinlists.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/picture-8-300x272.png" alt="" width="300" height="272" /></a></p>
<p>Tumblr:</p>
<p><a href="http://lifeinlists.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/picture-9.png"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-176" title="picture-9" src="http://lifeinlists.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/picture-9-300x266.png" alt="" width="300" height="266" /></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>As you can see, they look nothing alike. It turned out there was some major differences.  Here they are:</p>
<p><strong>1)</strong> Tumblr is more social. All my nerdy friends are already using it, so the dashboard of tumblr blogs i follow is already full of interesting content, and conversations for me to add to.</p>
<p><strong>2)</strong> Posterous handles full content posts with an image as well as multiple images.  Tumblr doesn&#8217;t do this all that well.</p>
<p>3) Posterous really works without ever really having to go to visit the site.  Tumblr tends to be more useful when you go visit the site and use it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Nice fun comparison. I probably wouldn&#8217;t use Tumblr to communicate with my non tech friends.  Now that the comparison experiment&#8217;s over I just post whatever I want to each!</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Tumblr+and+Posterous+side+by+side+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2F5s4YTo" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://evbart.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Tumblr+and+Posterous+side+by+side+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2F5s4YTo" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evbart.com/2008/09/tumblr-and-posterous-side-by-side/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mint makes improvements, but slows down categorizing</title>
		<link>http://evbart.com/2008/05/mint-makes-improvements-but-slows-down-categorizing/</link>
		<comments>http://evbart.com/2008/05/mint-makes-improvements-but-slows-down-categorizing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evbart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[web apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinlists.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mint.com is tearing it up these days, and almost blew Wesabe completely out of the water if it hadn&#8217;t been for wesabe&#8217;s recent new features. After a few minutes of using the UI I realized a core feature had changed for the worst, assigning categories to transactions. Its used to have a popup that contained [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mint.com is tearing it up these days, and almost blew <a href="https://www.wesabe.com/">Wesabe</a> completely out of the water if it hadn&#8217;t been for wesabe&#8217;s recent <a href="http://continuations.wenger.us/post/33429835">new features</a>.</p>
<p>After a few minutes of using the UI I realized a core feature had changed for the worst, assigning categories to transactions.</p>
<p>Its used to have a popup that contained all the transactions, and you could quickly find the one that you wanted.  Categorizing a long list of transactions was relatively simple and fast.  Here&#8217;s that list:</p>
<p><a href="http://lifeinlists.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/2008_0120_categories.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-113" title="2008_0120_categories" src="http://lifeinlists.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/2008_0120_categories.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="334" /></a></p>
<p>The new version of this is a drop-down that you have to mouse-over to find the subcategories.  Its a real pain, and put a serious dent in me keeping up with my tagging/categorizing.  They do have an auto-complete, but its a hassle to tab over to that field, and you can&#8217;t just hit the &#8220;enter&#8221; button to save the tag and go back to your transaction list.  Here&#8217;s what it looks like now:</p>
<p><a href="http://lifeinlists.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/wesabe-catetgories-new.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-115" title="wesabe-catetgories-new" src="http://lifeinlists.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/wesabe-catetgories-new.jpg" alt="" width="499" height="218" /></a></p>
<p>The other issue with this is, that you can&#8217;t bulk edit the merchant and the category independantly.  If you select 20 transactions, and want to make them all a certain category, it changes the Merchant name for all of these transactions to &#8220;Multiple Merchants&#8221;.  I lost some data this way!</p>
<p><a href="http://lifeinlists.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/picture-8.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-116" title="picture-8" src="http://lifeinlists.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/picture-8.png" alt="" width="500" height="194" /></a></p>
<p>Oops, in the making of that screenshot I accidently clicked Save and lost two more Merchant names!</p>
<p>Anyway, Mint.com is still my favorite personal finance application, and I havn&#8217;t been searching for a replacement.  These small quirks are a big enough pain to think about wesabe or <a href="http://www.buxfer.com/">buxfer</a> again.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Mint+makes+improvements%2C+but+slows+down+categorizing+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2F8nuTDW" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://evbart.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Mint+makes+improvements%2C+but+slows+down+categorizing+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2F8nuTDW" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evbart.com/2008/05/mint-makes-improvements-but-slows-down-categorizing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great idea: CRM research bookmarklet</title>
		<link>http://evbart.com/2008/05/great-idea-crm-research-bookmarklet/</link>
		<comments>http://evbart.com/2008/05/great-idea-crm-research-bookmarklet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evbart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bookmarklet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinlists.com/2008/05/great-idea-crm-research-bookmarklet/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some I&#8217;m throwing out some free ideas! We have all these bookmarking tools, and we have all these clipping, notebooking, and research tools.  But what are they all used for? I tend to use them a lot for research on people/companies in my industry, and often times this would be really useful to have directly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some I&#8217;m throwing out some free ideas!</p>
<p>We have all these bookmarking tools, and we have all these clipping, notebooking, and research tools.  But what are they all used for?</p>
<p>I tend to use them a lot for research on people/companies in my industry, and often times this would be really useful to have directly in my CRM system.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see a bookmarklet that lets you clip content, and then associate it directly with a contact or company in your CRM.  Store the notes/articles/clippings right with that particular entity, so that next time I look that person up I&#8217;ll know something about them, or have a conversation starter.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Great+idea%3A+CRM+research+bookmarklet+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FyjWMbj" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://evbart.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Great+idea%3A+CRM+research+bookmarklet+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FyjWMbj" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evbart.com/2008/05/great-idea-crm-research-bookmarklet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great idea: bookmarlet for importing contact information</title>
		<link>http://evbart.com/2008/05/great-idea-bookmarlet-for-importing-contact-information/</link>
		<comments>http://evbart.com/2008/05/great-idea-bookmarlet-for-importing-contact-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evbart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bookmarklet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great idea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinlists.com/2008/05/great-idea-bookmarlet-for-importing-contact-information/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#8217;ve raved about CRM systems and managing personal contact information, but now I have a solution, which I hope someone has already built. Someone needs to build a bookmarklet that lets you highlight contact information, and then with the click of a button send it to the right contact management tool (outlook, highrise, salesforce, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;ve raved about CRM systems and managing personal contact information, but now I have a solution, which I hope someone has already built.</p>
<p>Someone needs to build a bookmarklet that lets you highlight contact information, and then with the click of a button send it to the right contact management tool (outlook, highrise, salesforce, etc).</p>
<p>I hate copying and pasting over the address, then the phone number, then their name&#8230;.. the whole time worrying about errors in my data input.</p>
<p>You could highlight text in an email signature in gmail, you could highlight text on people&#8217;s websites, and then the bookmarklet would recognize the address, phone number, email, fax, and put them in the right places for that particular contact manager.</p>
<p>Obviously we would love an automated version that just recognized signatures in your inbox (Mac mail may have something like this), but a rapid contact importing tool like this would be the first step.</p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Great+idea%3A+bookmarlet+for+importing+contact+information+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FbGuQxC" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://evbart.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Great+idea%3A+bookmarlet+for+importing+contact+information+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FbGuQxC" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evbart.com/2008/05/great-idea-bookmarlet-for-importing-contact-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New startup taking bookmarking/archiving to the next level</title>
		<link>http://evbart.com/2008/05/new-startup-taking-bookmarkingarchiving-to-the-next-level/</link>
		<comments>http://evbart.com/2008/05/new-startup-taking-bookmarkingarchiving-to-the-next-level/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evbart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[bookmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinlists.com/2008/05/new-startup-taking-bookmarkingarchiving-to-the-next-level/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a little tool called Iterasi, that sounds like a big step in the direction of my ravings on tracking online data, collectively researching links and articles, and a recent post of an article on information processing online written long ago but lost. Here&#8217;s what VentureBeat said: Instead of just saving links, you use Iterasi [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a little <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/06/iterasis-better-bookmarking-service-now-in-private-beta/">tool called Iterasi</a>, that sounds like a big step in the direction of my ravings on <a href="http://lifeinlists.com/2007/10/information-processing/">tracking online data</a>, <a href="http://lifeinlists.com/2006/06/blag-blogging-links-articles/">collectively researching links and articles</a>, a<a href="http://lifeinlists.com/2008/05/information_processing_what_i_save_where_i_save_it/">nd a recent post of an article on information processing online written long ago but lost.</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what VentureBeat said:</p>
<blockquote><p>Instead of just saving links, you use Iterasi to save all of the information on a page, including images and links, a process it calls “notarizing.” Log in to your Iterasi account and you can access the actual page. <a href="http://www.labnol.org/software/organize/clip-save-web-pages-images-iterasi/3190/" id="yku2" title="In the future">In the future</a>, you’ll also be able to have the site to automatically notarize a page based on a pre-set schedule. You can also search the text within a page (which you can’t do with a screenshot image).</p></blockquote>
<p>Eventually there will be one tool that grabs everything you read, lets you tag it, lets you hightlight certain clips, stores archives of everything, and makes it completely searchable online and offline!  It might be a small startup like Iterasi, or it might end up being Google with a combination of products like <a href="http://www.google.com/notebook/">Google Notebook,</a> <a href="http://www.google.com/coop/">Google Co-op</a>, and <a href="http://www.google.com/history/">Google Web History</a></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=New+startup+taking+bookmarking%2Farchiving+to+the+next+level+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FVj5mfE" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://evbart.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=New+startup+taking+bookmarking%2Farchiving+to+the+next+level+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FVj5mfE" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evbart.com/2008/05/new-startup-taking-bookmarkingarchiving-to-the-next-level/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Information processing online: what I save and where I save it</title>
		<link>http://evbart.com/2008/05/information_processing_what_i_save_where_i_save_it/</link>
		<comments>http://evbart.com/2008/05/information_processing_what_i_save_where_i_save_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 03:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evbart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinlists.com/2008/05/104/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the second post on a series of how I process information online, what tools i use, and what I think would be the perfect solution. First, lets address the specific types of information I save: I save Links I save/archive the full or partial content of articles/posts/etc I save specific clips of content [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the second post on a series of how I <a href="http://lifeinlists.com/2007/10/information-processing/" title="process information online" id="kenj">process information online</a>, what tools i use, and what I think would be the perfect solution.<br id="sswt2" /> <br id="sswt3" /> First, lets address the specific types of information I save:<br id="sswt4" /> <br id="sswt5" /></p>
<ol id="sswt6">
<li id="sswt7">     I save Links</li>
<li id="sswt8">     I save/archive the full or partial content of articles/posts/etc<br id="sswt9" /></li>
<li id="sswt10">     I save specific clips of content within a page<br id="sswt11" /></li>
<li id="sswt12">     I save certain clips  of content along with remarks to be publish on my blog<br id="sswt13" /></li>
<li id="sswt14">     I save things to send to my phone via sms</li>
<li id="sswt15">     I save clips of content that I want to email to people</li>
<li id="sswt16">     I save multiple pieces of content around a specific topic or multiple clips pertaining to one topic</li>
</ol>
<p><br id="sswt17" /> Any of these things I save, I always want the ability to choose whether it is private, public, or shared to a restricted group of users.  AND I don&#8217;t want them to have to have an account on the same service in order to see this information I&#8217;m sharing.<br id="sswt18" /> <br id="sswt19" /> Private &#8211; just for me<br id="sswt20" /> Public &#8211; for everyone<br id="sswt21" /> Restricted Group -just a list of users I choose.<br id="sswt22" /> <br id="sswt23" /> Now, how do I currently save each of these information types:<br id="sswt24" /> <br id="sswt25" /> <br id="sswt26" /></p>
<ol id="sswt27">
<li id="sswt28">     I save Links
<ul id="sswt29">
<li id="sswt30">       <font id="sswt31" color="#ff0000">Delicious, Diigo, Gmail</font></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li id="sswt32">     I save/archive the full or partial content of articles/posts/etc
<ul id="sswt33">
<li id="sswt34">       <font id="sswt35" color="#ff0000">Diigo, Scrapbook, Notebook, Clipmarks</font></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li id="sswt36">     I save specific clips of content within a page
<ul id="sswt37">
<li id="sswt38">       <font id="sswt39" color="#ff0000">Google Notebook, Clipmarks, Diigo</font></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li id="sswt40">     I save certain clips  of content along with remarks to be publish on my blog
<ul id="sswt41">
<li id="sswt42">       <font id="sswt43" color="#ff0000">Diigo, Clipmarks, WordPress</font><br id="sswt44" /></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li id="sswt45">     I save things to send to my phone via sms
<ul id="sswt46">
<li id="sswt47">       <font id="sswt48" color="#ff0000">&#8220;Send via SMS&#8221;, Google SMS</font></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li id="sswt49">     I save clips of content that I want to email to people
<ul id="sswt50">
<li id="sswt51">       <font id="sswt52" color="#ff0000">&#8220;Gmail This&#8221;, Diggo, Clipmarks, Google Notebook</font></li>
</ul>
</li>
<li id="sswt53">     I save multiple pieces of content around a specific topic or multiple clips pertaining to one topic
<ul id="sswt54">
<li id="sswt55">       <font id="sswt56" color="#ff0000">Google Notebook</font><br id="sswt57" /></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ol>
<p><br id="sswt58" /> <br id="sswt59" /> As you can see, there is a relatively concise grouping of types of data, but the choices for where I can store this data are rather mind boggling.  I would like to reduce that clutter, and in further posts will try to propose a solution.<br id="sswt60" /> <br id="sswt61" /> <br id="sswt62" /> <br id="sswt63" /><br id="sswt64" /></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Information+processing+online%3A+what+I+save+and+where+I+save+it+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FxCc6Rh" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://evbart.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Information+processing+online%3A+what+I+save+and+where+I+save+it+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FxCc6Rh" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evbart.com/2008/05/information_processing_what_i_save_where_i_save_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VC style due diligence on web apps</title>
		<link>http://evbart.com/2008/04/vc_style_due_diligence_on_web_apps/</link>
		<comments>http://evbart.com/2008/04/vc_style_due_diligence_on_web_apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 06:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evbart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinlists.com/2008/04/103/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I have a need, and go to find a web application to meet that need, why does it seem like I have to do VC style due diligence on all the companies in that space to make my final decision.Simple answers:1) I&#8217;m super obsessive compulsive about web apps2) There are too many web apps3) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I have a need, and go to find a web application to meet that need, why does it seem like I have to do VC style due diligence on all the companies in that space to make my final decision.<br id="et3d0" /><br id="pgf:0" />Simple answers:<br id="du8-2" />1) I&#8217;m super obsessive compulsive about web apps<br id="du8-3" />2) There are too many web apps<br id="du8-4" />3) Theres no central useful review of all of them<br id="lbgz" /><br id="kj880" />To decide on what social book/reading site I wanted to use, I went through dozens of sites, analyzed different metrics, and wrote two posts (<a href="http://lifeinlists.com/2006/09/cataloging-your-media/" title="1" id="q9vu">1</a>, <a href="http://lifeinlists.com/2008/04/revisiting_cataloging_your_media/" title="2" id="scv3">2</a> ) to find the one I wanted.  The worst part, is that I ended up doing all that work to decide on a webapp, only to get invited to GoodReads a few days later, which hadn&#8217;t even shown up on my radar.  I am now using Good Reads because all my friends are, and it has most of the features i want. <span id="more-116"></span> <br id="b7df0" /><br id="b7df1" />There&#8217;s got to be a better way.  Personally, I like to use a combination of <a href="http://del.icio.us/" title="del.ico.us" id="lhoq">del.ico.us</a>, and <a href="http://www.emilychang.com/go/ehub/" title="ehub" id="txsp">ehub</a>.  Delicious tends to let you know how popular something is, while ehub is a more extensive directory that often contains nuggets of undiscovered apps.<br id="d0vm0" /><br id="d0vm1" />Otherwise, you could go to the application directories:<br id="dhfp0" /><br id="dhfp2" /><a href="http://simplespark.com/" title="http://simplespark.com/" id="sb3c">http://simplespark.com/</a> <br id="z9m70" /><a href="http://www.feedmyapp.com/" title="http://www.feedmyapp.com/" id="y9x5">http://www.feedmyapp.com/</a> <br id="z9m71" /><a href="http://wikkidapps.com/" title="http://wikkidapps.com/" id="jvwt">http://wikkidapps.com/</a> <br id="kj881" /><a href="http://www.go2web20.net/" title="http://www.go2web20.net/" id="uxgm">http://www.go2web20.net/</a> <br id="kj882" /><a href="http://o20db.com/" title="http://o20db.com/" id="keil">http://o20db.com/</a> <br id="vro-0" /><a href="http://www.buzzshout.com/" title="http://www.buzzshout.com/" id="uq40">http://www.buzzshout.com/</a> <br id="dhfp3" /><br id="cgu30" /><br id="pgf:2" /> These are a good start, but these directory sites are for industry geeks (i&#8217;m one of them!), many of them web2.0 focused.  They still require work, and and pretty in depth understanding of the space.  The only thing real world people (ones that won&#8217;t waste hours to get into this stuff) care about is, is which application one is the best, which one does exactly what i need it to do.<br id="cgu31" /><br id="cgu32" /><a href="http://moreganize.com/" id="t8lh26" target="_blank"></a><br id="nz-8" />            <br id="hebu0" /><br id="qdp30" /><br id="t6hb0" /><br id="t6hb1" /><br id="t6hb2" /><br id="t6hb3" /><br id="t6hb4" /><br id="t6hb5" /><br id="f-te0" /><br id="n2wl0" /></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=VC+style+due+diligence+on+web+apps+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FDKRTIz" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://evbart.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=VC+style+due+diligence+on+web+apps+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FDKRTIz" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evbart.com/2008/04/vc_style_due_diligence_on_web_apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revisiting Cataloging your media</title>
		<link>http://evbart.com/2008/04/revisiting_cataloging_your_media/</link>
		<comments>http://evbart.com/2008/04/revisiting_cataloging_your_media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evbart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[personal productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinlists.com/2008/04/102/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[warning: this post is a mess, and mostly an example of how much of a pain it can be to find the right application I don&#8217;t even know what to call this category of application!! How am I ever going to find the &#8220;Last.fm&#8221; or &#8220;del.icio.us&#8221; of reading applications?I really focused on 3 things1) how [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>warning: this post is a mess, and mostly an example of how much of a pain it can be to find the right application </em></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even know what to call this category of application!! How am I ever going to find the &#8220;Last.fm&#8221; or &#8220;del.icio.us&#8221; of reading applications?<br id="hjwo4" /><br id="xyg00" />I really focused on 3 things<br id="xyg01" />1) how do they let you tag the books (tagging, categorizing, bookshelves)<br id="xyg02" />2) how many people were using it<br id="jlfb0" />3) how easy it was for me to add my friends<br id="b5o-0" /><br id="hjwo11" /><br id="hjwo14" /><span id="b5o-1"><strong>New sites to review</strong></span><br id="hjwo15" /><br id="hjwo16" /><a href="http://www.goodreads.com/">http://www.goodreads.com/</a><br id="hjwo17" />- traffic? (couldnt tell fight club because of tagging)<br id="hjwo18" />- funky taggin<br id="hjwo19" />- offers rss feed subscription updates<br id="hjwo20" /><br id="hjwo21" /><a href="http://www.bookjetty.com/">http://www.bookjetty.com/</a><br id="hjwo22" />- wanted, reading, read<br id="hjwo23" />- doesn&#8217;t look like too many people on it (5 for fight club)<br id="hjwo24" /><br id="hjwo25" /><span id="more-115"></span><a href="http://www.bookjetty.com/">http://www.allconsuming.net/</a><br id="hjwo26" />- 677 fight club<br id="hjwo27" />- I intend to consume this, I am consuming this now, i have consumed this<br id="hjwo28" />- not great detail on feedback (wish washy, worth consuming, not worth consuming)<br id="hjwo29" />- does food<br id="hjwo30" /><a href="http://www.bookbump.com/"><br id="hjwo31" />http://www.bookbump.com/</a><br id="hjwo32" /><a href="http://reader2.com/"><br id="hjwo33" />http://reader2.com/</a><br id="hjwo34" /><br id="hjwo35" /><a href="http://www.booktagger.com/">http://www.booktagger.com/</a><br id="hjwo36" />- clunky UI<br id="hjwo37" />- can only have book in 1 category at a time<br id="hjwo38" />- currently reading, books i want to buy, i have read, i own, i want to read, i have borowed, i have lent<br id="hjwo39" /><br id="hjwo40" /><a href="http://www.22books.com/">http://www.22books.com/</a><br id="hjwo41" /><br id="b5o-2" /><br id="hjwo42" /><span id="yel90"><strong>Old Sites </strong></span><a href="http://lifeinlists.com/2006/09/cataloging-your-media/" title="from my first review" id="ocmp"><strong>from my first review</strong></a> <br id="hjwo43" /><br id="hjwo44" /><a href="http://www.librarything.com/">http://www.librarything.com/</a><br id="hjwo45" />-simple<br id="hjwo46" />- 4,800 for fight club, so getting mass<br id="hjwo47" />- tagging<br id="hjwo48" /><br id="hjwo49" /><a href="http://www.gurulib.com/">http://www.gurulib.com/</a><br id="hjwo50" />- fast search!<br id="hjwo51" />- can create your own shelves<br id="hjwo52" /><br id="hjwo53" /><a href="http://lib.rario.us/"><br id="hjwo54" />http://lib.rario.us/</a><br id="hjwo55" />- didnt have a &#8220;i forgot my password&#8221;<br id="hjwo56" /><br id="hjwo57" /><a href="http://www.listal.com/">http://www.listal.com/</a><br id="hjwo58" />- suprisingly tough to use<br id="hjwo59" />- 170 for flight club<br id="hjwo60" /><br id="hjwo61" /><a href="http://www.shelfari.com/">http://www.shelfari.com/</a><br id="hjwo62" />-annoying emails<br id="hjwo63" />- easy to add books to shelf<br id="hjwo64" />- cheesy graphics<br id="hjwo65" />- handles classifying books well<br id="hjwo66" />- cant review it till you&#8217;ve read it<br id="hjwo67" />-3,800 fight club<br id="hjwo68" /><br id="hjwo69" /><a href="http://squirl.info/">http://squirl.info/</a><br id="hjwo70" /><br id="hjwo71" /><br id="hjwo72" /><br id="hjwo73" /><br id="hjwo74" /><br id="hjwo75" /></p>
<pre id="hjwo76" class="w_tables"><br id="ztha0" /></pre>
<p><br id="hjwo100" /><br id="ycx00" /></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Revisiting+Cataloging+your+media+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2F8PdItj" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://evbart.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Revisiting+Cataloging+your+media+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2F8PdItj" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evbart.com/2008/04/revisiting_cataloging_your_media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Fav Travel Sites</title>
		<link>http://evbart.com/2008/04/my_fav_travel_sites/</link>
		<comments>http://evbart.com/2008/04/my_fav_travel_sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 02:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evbart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinlists.com/2008/04/100/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I first wrote about travel sites here, but I&#8217;ve been traveling even more lately (couple weeks a month) and I&#8217;ve been putting some travel sites through the ringer. Here&#8217;s my favorite sites, they have to be fast, functional, and provide clear value right from the start (unlike this blog, but im working on getting to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first wrote about travel sites <a id="qte-" title="here" href="http://lifeinlists.com/2008/01/travelapps/">here</a>, but I&#8217;ve been traveling even more lately (couple weeks a month) and I&#8217;ve been putting some travel sites through the ringer. Here&#8217;s my favorite sites, they have to be fast, functional, and provide clear value right from the start (unlike this blog, but im working on getting to the point faster!!):<br id="zxy0" /><br id="dk7z" /><span id="hcu7"><a id="rb7j" title="Tripit" href="http://www.tripit.com/"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Tripit</span></strong></a> </span><br id="f6wk" /><br id="qz_n" />Makes killer itineraries simply by having you forward your reservation emails to plans@tripit.com.  Dead simple, and dead useful!!<br id="hjkx" /><br id="y.gf" /><span id="zpwd"><a id="o9jw" title="Kayak" href="http://www.kayak.com/"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Kayak</span></strong></a> </span><br id="rrz_" /><br id="qpfq" />Search hard and search fast, search through everything (a ton of other travel sites).  Great for flights, decent for hotels, not so hot for car rentals.<br id="ui6g" /><br id="x_3-" /><a id="uc46" title="TripAdvisor" href="http://www.tripadvisor.com/"><strong>TripAdvisor</strong></a> <br id="k2_e" /><br id="zan2" />Best reviews for hotel.  User generated reviews that are some how much better and much more useful than other plays.  Made several decisions based on their advice and everything was spot on.<br id="bxtm" /><br id="zj4t" /><br id="nuvm" />Here are some more I haven&#8217;t had a chance to use:<br id="rnu7" /><br id="hucy" /><a id="wsfx" title="http://www.igougo.com/" href="http://www.igougo.com/">http://www.igougo.com/</a> <br id="ojjg" /><a id="p:0l" title="http://www.travature.com/" href="http://www.travature.com/">http://www.travature.com/</a> <br id="w_7v" /><a id="q_at" title="http://www.triptouch.com/" href="http://www.triptouch.com/">http://www.triptouch.com/</a> <br id="x7fy" /><a id="t36j" title="http://www.driftr.com/" href="http://www.driftr.com/">http://www.driftr.com/</a> <br id="e_vk" /><a id="np_8" title="http://www.flightstats.com/go/Home/home.do" href="http://www.flightstats.com/go/Home/home.do">http://www.flightstats.com/go/Home/home.do</a> <br id="hv6-" /><a id="hf0j" title="http://www.dopplr.com/" href="http://www.dopplr.com/">http://www.dopplr.com/</a> <br id="s6on" /><br id="v49q" />And here&#8217;s an uber big daddy list:<br id="m2kz" /><br id="jcsd" /><a id="df76" title="http://www.luggageonline.com/50-travel-sites.cfm" href="http://www.luggageonline.com/50-travel-sites.cfm">http://www.luggageonline.com/50-travel-sites.cfm</a> <br id="pigq" /> <br id="zfs9" /><br id="qwmy" /><br id="tm:6" /><br id="yc:x" /><br id="l3t3" /><br id="o2l8" /><br id="gxwx" /><br id="s89x" /><br id="u:fv" /></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=My+Fav+Travel+Sites+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2F4emGsh" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://evbart.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=My+Fav+Travel+Sites+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2F4emGsh" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evbart.com/2008/04/my_fav_travel_sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simplicity versus complexity</title>
		<link>http://evbart.com/2008/03/simplicity_versus_complexity/</link>
		<comments>http://evbart.com/2008/03/simplicity_versus_complexity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 00:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>evbart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web apps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lifeinlists.com/2008/03/98/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just read &#8220;The Brash Boys at 37 Signals Will Tell Yo: Keep it Simple Stupid&#8221; in Wired Magazine, and it got me all fired up to write a response, because I thought it developed an incomplete picture. 37 signals leads the charge for one of Web 2.0&#8242;s core tenants, simplicity. Their rapid/rabid pursuit of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/magazine/16-03/mf_signals" id="h9au">&#8220;The Brash Boys at 37 Signals Will Tell Yo: Keep it Simple Stupid&#8221;</a> in <a href="http://www.wired.com/" title="wired Magazine" id="fvh0">Wired Magazine</a>, and it got me all fired up to write a response, because I thought it developed an incomplete picture.  <br id="v4rp" /><br id="p7.j" />37 signals leads the charge for one of Web 2.0&#8242;s core tenants, simplicity.  Their rapid/rabid pursuit of a minimalist products has found a niche in the market, and I respect them for being uncompromising in their approach.  <br id="maem" /><br id="i70k" />If a user decides that a simple robust feature set is not what they want, then they can go use something else.  You cannot build everything for everyone, and sometimes this results in you losing users.  You have to do this to protect your core user base, the people that are there for the simplicity, the ones that might not be using this type of software at all if it wasn&#8217;t for the simple approach.  Obviously, if you start to lose a much more significant number of users, then you have to think about growing with your user base.<span id="more-111"></span><br id="k7bu" /><br id="zyfd" />With <a href="http://angelsoft.net/" title="Angelsoft" id="lcej">Angelsoft</a>, I&#8217;ve (or rather the dev team) experienced many of these tensions.  There is no such thing as a &#8220;standard&#8221; Angel group (our core focus right now), so every single group has a wide variety of requests, and building a standard application that works for all of these un-standardized groups becomes really difficult.  We spend a lot of time deciding (arguing) which features to leave in, and which features to throw out.  At some point in time each one of our clients has asked for every single feature you can imagine, some of which we couldn&#8217;t even see how the feature would be useful.  In the end, we have to decide what Angelsoft wants to protect, and then we continually have to resell the user on our vision, so they can be happy moving on without that feature (or knowing we&#8217;re addressing that issue in another way).<br id="wrc-" /><code></code><br id="jfho" />37 signals really brought this concept to the forefront for me.  They have drawn a line in the sand, and said over this line we do not cross.   Does that work for me? No, not up until recently.  I&#8217;ve never paid for any of their products, and frankly I&#8217;ve never stuck to using any of their products for any extended amount of time.  This is probably for a lack of need on my part, and not for any issues with their design and business methodology.  I&#8217;m definitely considering using highrise because of my frustrations with salesforce.com.  But as I go into evaluating high-rise, I no high-rise doesn&#8217;t track opportunities or sales pipelines.  I know it&#8217;s not a CRM, and I don&#8217;t have to fear that it will grow (bloat) into one.  There are products, however slowly, filling the middle ground between high-rise in salesforce.com (see ).<br id="avtp" /><br id="pwwy" />My point is, they don&#8217;t have to be assholes about it, but they have a perfectly good reason to do what they&#8217;re doing.  They found a market, they are sticking to it, they didn&#8217;t take outside funding, so now they don&#8217;t have to buckle to VC pressure to &#8220;go big&#8221;.  Most importantly, regardless of what you think of simplicity, complexity is NOT the answer.<br id="ur._" /><br id="mv3j" />In the wired article a Microsoft consultant says &#8220;complexity is a necessary byproduct of the modern age.&#8221; What?!?!?!  complexity is a byproduct of bad design, and bad software companies!!  Look at companies like Google and Apple.  They&#8217;ve made entire growing businesses of simple software.  Even worse, Microsoft goes on to explain that customers actually want and use the extra features.  I&#8217;m a power user, and I don&#8217;t use 1/100th of the features in word and excel?!  Who are these people using all these features?  Last time I worked in a big company, the people could barely use excel, much less their extremely expensive document managment platforms, and reporting packages.  That&#8217;s exactly why <a href="http://lifeinlists.com/2008/03/file_syncing/" title="I switched to Google docs" id="h.df">I switched to Google docs</a>, and that&#8217;s why Google docs will start taking more market share as soon as the masses get comfortable with online web apps in general.  I don&#8217;t need any of those extra features, and the extra online accessibility definitely provides added value.<br id="d1-y" /><br id="d:eq" />I&#8217;ll take my theory is a step further.  I think most software fails because of complexity.  Not that successful companies can&#8217;t be built on &#8220;failed&#8221; software.  I have been using (aka struggling) salesforce.com for over four years, and I am just now figuring out mildly useful ways of using the application.  This experience has led me to discover that salesforce.com is completely unusable for the day-to-day use of a salesperson (I&#8217;ll have another post on this soon).  They are a successful company because their sales team sells well to managers.  Managers want a dashboard that tracks their sales pipeline, in salesforce can deliver that, if the client strictly enforces the use of salesforce across the entire company.   In the end, a much simpler product could provide the same results, by providing a better experience to the salesperson, resulting in their eager participation, and more accurate data reporting. <br id="ln5r" /><br id="l8cz" />I think this problem affects most software in the enterprise software space, and smaller companies with simpler products will start carving out market share from them.  The enterprise world has been completely delusional thinking that their employees are using and getting benefit from their overly complicated, bloated, massively expensive &#8220;IT projects&#8221; that took years to put in place.  <br id="x.yx" /><br id="o1g4" />Time to start innovating!<br id="sd.d" /><br id="yzm0" /><br id="y4yw" /><br id="t954" /><br id="pxh:" /></p>
<div class="tweetthis" style="text-align:left;"><p> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Simplicity+versus+complexity+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FlM5rzo" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://evbart.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/en/twitter/tt-twitter.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a> <a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Simplicity+versus+complexity+http%3A%2F%2Fis.gd%2FlM5rzo" title="Post to Twitter">Tweet This Post</a></p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evbart.com/2008/03/simplicity_versus_complexity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

